Re: "Special Application Addresses" (Was: Re: [ipv6-wg] RE: address-policy-wg(ipv6-wg digest, Vol 1 #271 - 11 msgs))
-
To: ,
-
From: Jeroen Massar <>
-
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 14:50:39 +0100
-
Openpgp: id=333E7C23;url=http://unfix.org/~jeroen/jeroen-unfix.org-pgpkey
-
Organization: Unfix
peter.sherbin@localhost wrote:
> Jeroen, thanks for your response.
>
>>> The application has to:
>>> 1. avoid renumbering of the network
>> Why? Your application should be able to use renumber easily using a form
>> of management interface.
>
> I am using addresses to monitor my devices all the way through their
> life cycle. In some cases it could be a physical life cycle from a few
> weeks to a few years. I may also aggregate individual items to larger
> sub groups. That is why I do not want any changes to static addresses
> for unspecified time.
The solution for the above can easily be solved by using DNS or a myriad
of other solutions. Either you give all those devices a DNS label where
they can contact their 'report server' or you give those devices the
ability to register to that server. There are many possibilities here
and none of these require any specific address space.
I suggest you check out mail spam bots and viruses. They implement this
all too perfectly well.
<SNIP>
>> PS: You might want to delete unused parts of emails, sending 27kb of
>> quoted email which you don't reference is useless. Also changing the
>> subject helps identifying what you are actually mailing about.
>
> It is a learning curve. will do next time. thanks for pointing this out.
I suggest you also read the following article:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/documents/quotingguide.html
(Lines 80 chars and more are not very readable either)
Greets,
Jeroen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
|