RE: [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?

[Tim Streater <]

At 11:19 14/11/2005, Jørgen Hovland wrote:

>So we are back at the beginning;
>I say no to anycast PI for TLDs/ccTLDs. I don't believe it is a special case
>so it doesn't need a special policy. TLDs/ccTLDs could/should however be
>used as an argument to allow v6 PI prefixes in general.
>V6 PI compared to v4 surely is a showstopper for many, or at least for some.

It's a showstopper for us on one of the networks we manage. We can't get V6 PI for it like we could v4 PI. 

-- Tim