About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?

  • To: Gert Doering <
    >
  • From: Randy Bush <
    >
  • Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 03:12:47 -1000
  • Cc: Jørgen Hovland <
    >,
    ,

>>> That's the point.  DENIC isn't doing this for themselves.  They
>>> do this for *you*
>> in a peer2peer or client/server world, this statement is fatuous
> So we abandon DNS, because it's a model from the last century?

you can if you want to.  i did not suggest doing so, so i guess
you would like to.  whatever rocks your boat.

my point was simple, aside from the total end user (ones not
running edonkey or having bought sony cds), most hosts provide
to others, certainly all interesting hosts.

while folk who need to look up in the de namespace appreciate
what denic does, i don't think they do it for free.  so we'll
withold the gold medals if you don't mind.

randy




 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community