|
|
 |
RE: [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
-
To: "'Kurt Erik Lindqvist'" <>
-
From: Jørgen Hovland <>
-
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 16:47:14 +0100
-
Cc: <>, <>
Hi,
-----Original Message-----
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist [ ]
Sent: 13. november 2005 15:32
>In the first scenario you are forced to the routing policies of ISP x
>and only to the locations of ISP x. In the second example you can co-
>locate, connect to and IXP and do your own routing decisions as well
>as be present at locations you choose (without "vasting" or even
>having to go to 11 servers).
You will always be forced to obey the rules of whatever provider you are
using, ISP or IXP. I get the impression that you believe ISP x's routing
policies will always be insufficient for you. Nameservers are not the only
anycast service so it would be tricky to discuss this in general.
But you want your nameserver to be reachable, that I know. Both scenarios
will accomplish that with the same amount of redundancy. What kind of
routing policies do you mean? Do you want to restrict your reachability?
Joergen Hovland
|
|
|
|
