About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

RE: [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?

  • To: "'Gert Doering'" <
    >
  • From: Jørgen Hovland <
    >
  • Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 20:01:36 +0100
  • Cc: <
    >,<
    >,<
    >


-----Original Message-----
From: Gert Doering [
] Sent: 11. november 2005 19:02 >So where's the benefit if DENIC sets up something inside MCI's network >that only MCI customers can see? And *if* the route is leaked outside, >what is gained, except people will have to maintain explicit white-lists >("hey, this /64 is DENIC-anycast, so we permit it, while not permitting >other /64s")? I will try to explain more detailed: A large network provider can have hundreds/thousands of peers. These peers receive the same /32 prefix. A large network provider has housing facilities many places in many countries. * Put your server in some or all of these housing facilities. * Give every server the same IP address. * Tell large network provider to use the closest path and make a route to this IP address where you have your servers (use a routing protocol or whatever) * The peers of large network provider will be routed to the closest DENIC server in large network providers network. * If a server is down, the next closest DENIC server will get the traffic. * There is no single point of failure here. * You are using anycast. * You have a multiple failover solution. I hope this was clear enough. Cheers, Joergen Hovland

 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community