|
|
 |
RE: [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
-
To: "'Gert Doering'" <>
-
From: Jørgen Hovland <>
-
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 20:01:36 +0100
-
Cc: <>,<>,<>
-----Original Message-----
From: Gert Doering [ ]
Sent: 11. november 2005 19:02
>So where's the benefit if DENIC sets up something inside MCI's network
>that only MCI customers can see? And *if* the route is leaked outside,
>what is gained, except people will have to maintain explicit white-lists
>("hey, this /64 is DENIC-anycast, so we permit it, while not permitting
>other /64s")?
I will try to explain more detailed:
A large network provider can have hundreds/thousands of peers. These peers
receive the same /32 prefix. A large network provider has housing facilities
many places in many countries.
* Put your server in some or all of these housing facilities.
* Give every server the same IP address.
* Tell large network provider to use the closest path and make a route to
this IP address where you have your servers (use a routing protocol or
whatever)
* The peers of large network provider will be routed to the closest DENIC
server in large network providers network.
* If a server is down, the next closest DENIC server will get the traffic.
* There is no single point of failure here.
* You are using anycast.
* You have a multiple failover solution.
I hope this was clear enough.
Cheers,
Joergen Hovland
|
|
 |
 |