Re: [ipv6-wg@ripe.net] DNS Weather Report 2004-09-07
- Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 01:04:23 +0200
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 05:07:22PM +0200, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
> Sending *unsolicited* automatic reports to *multiple* mailing lists
> is considered bad netiquette.
And forwarding private email conversation to public mailinglists
without asking correspondees permission is not considered bad
netiquette? Double standards?
> In your case even more so since similar and better defined reports
> are available on demand from more than one source.
Obviously those have NOT lead to getting problems fixed. I was
SHOCKED about the ugly state of those vital infrastructure zones when
I did the first survey.
> It would have been more acceptable to say something like:
> "Hey, I have made this useful report. What do you think about it?
> If you are interested you can subscribe to regular reports here."
That makes it easy to ignore the problems, eh? See my other mail
where I compare with the CIDR report.
> These days netiquette is violated so frequently that most people
> do not even care to point things out to violators;
> they just ignore messages from people who do not behave socially.
> Procmail is an easy tool.
Feel free to procmail me away.
> [I spent 6 minutes composing this message. Multiply by n>20 / day]
You've decided for yourself how much you expose yourself to public
communication.
Daniel
|