[ipv6-wg@localhost] Re: [sig-ipv6] 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)

[Anand Kumria <]

On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 10:10:19AM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> [ Cross-post, to get everybody in sync,
> Other messages in this thread can be found at:
> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail-archives/ipv6-wg/2004/msg00089.html ]
> 
> On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 09:58, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
> 
> > On 2004-07-22, at 09.43, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> > 
> > > But indeed, if there is concensus or not 9/9/2004 and ip6.int is gone
> > > for me.
> > 
> > I vote for 9/9/2004 and getting rid of it properly. Maintaining two 
> > reverse threes will create more problems than it will solve.

What, specifically, is the hurry? 

> 
> Take your pick:
> 
> http://unfix.org/~jeroen/archive/drafts/draft-massar-v6ops-ip6int-removal-00.html
> http://unfix.org/~jeroen/archive/drafts/draft-massar-v6ops-ip6int-removal-00.txt
> http://unfix.org/~jeroen/archive/drafts/draft-massar-v6ops-ip6int-removal-00.xml
> 
> Short, quick and easy.
> If no comments are risen for 16:00 today I'll submit this as an ID.

Comments:
	e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa was documented in RFC3681 published in February
	2004 and actioned in July 2004.

	I'm assuming the actioning of e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa is the trigger
	for this I-D; if so, why do you want to wait so little time (2
	months) between e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa becoming available and
	requiring people to have updated resolver libraries?

	Personally I'd be more in favour of a 6 month timeout - i.e
	around last December or so.

Anand

-- 
 `` All actions take place in time by the interweaving of the 
 forces of Nature; but the man lost in selfish delusion thinks 
 that he himself is the actor.'' 
        Lord Krishna to Arjuna in _The Bhagavad Gita_