Re: [ipv6-wg@localhost] ...DNS Root Servers...

[Andrius Kasparavicius <]

wow, last time I checked root servers(several weeks ago, they was
unreacheble-not operational.. now looks great:

F:
11  2001:500::1035 (2001:500::1035)  192.812 ms  192.25 ms  192.513 ms

only one BGP path to 2001:500::/48 prefix ;( anyway it works! :

H: unreachible, no BGP paths to 13 ASn, maybe /48 get's filtered?

and what about anycast implementation for root servers? It would be great
in perfomance, dunno in security & how stable it could be in attacs..

I'll try to add F to my bind root servers ;)

Andrius

On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Carlos Friacas wrote:

>
> Hello,
>
> As you may have noticed "M", located at Tokyo was assigned 2001:0DC3::/32
> from APNIC last week, with the status "ASSIGNED PORTABLE".
>
> Looking at http://www.root-servers.org, i see there are two root-servers
> located in the RIPE region that could get a /32 from RIPE, provided that
> RIPE would adopt the same policy than APNIC in this case:
>
> - "I" at Stockholm, Sweden;
> - "K" at London, England.
>
> Regarding the other 10 dns root servers, 2 of them already have IPv6
> assignments from ARIN's microallocation pool ("F" and "H"), which is in
> fact a different approach. As we speak im getting around 400ms rtt to "H"
> and about 240 rtt to "F". Anybody (around Europe) is getting significantly
> better values?
>
> Any comments?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> ./Carlos
>                                                           "Networking is fun!"
> --------------         [http://www.ip6.fccn.pt]            http://www.fccn.pt
> cfriacas@localhost, CMF8-RIPE, CF596-ARIN, Wide Area Network Workgroup
> F.C.C.N. - Fundacao para a Computacao Cientifica Nacional  fax: +351 218472167
>
>    "Internet is just routes (125953/461), naming (millions) and... people!"
>
>
>
>