Re: [6bone] RE: [ipv6-wg@localhost] Update on IPv6 filter recommendation

[Carlos Morgado <]

On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 08:06:40AM -0700, Michel Py wrote:
> Carlos,
> 
> 
> > Carlos Morgado wrote:
> > Yes, that is indeed one scenario. But consider the extreme
> > case of an operator which only sells transits to multihomed
> > customers who already have their own address.
> 
> Can you come with a real example? More, can you come up with a real
> example that has applied for space and has been denied the prefix?
> 

I've exposed this problem to RIPE with details about the network, 
size of transited and allocated ipv4 space and RIPE's reply was if it
doesn't fit the policy it won't get approved. After some adding up
of current ipv4 space usage I came to the conclusion without some very
wishfull thinking and extremly colourfull planing the submited plan
wouldn't reach the 200 /48 requisites. 

So, I'm under the category - never submited a plan cause it wouldn't
be aproved. 

-- 
Carlos Morgado chbm@localhost - Internet Engineering - Phone +351 214146594
GPG key: 0x75E451E2 FP: B98B 222B F276 18C0 266B  599D 93A1 A3FB 75E4 51E2
The views expressed above do not bind my employer.