Re: [ipv6-wg@localhost] Re: [lir-wg] IXP networks routing

[Måns Nilsson <]

--On Wednesday, March 05, 2003 16:46:50 +0200 Pekka Savola
pekkas@localhost wrote:

> No, (global) AS number is definitely not required, and if you really
> want,  you could do without even a private ASn.
> 
> A rather common scenario is to use private ASN to two providers, and leak
> more specifics from beyond your preferred ISP to the world -- and connect
> to the ISP as a secondary which owns the aggregate.

Might be so, but even I am opposed to such ugliness. I have yet to see it,
probably because most people doing so are ashamed of the practice...

Furthermore, it might be possible to deprecate the behaviour of multihoming
without public AS in v6, simply because few people will accept routes for
smaller prefixes than /32.. 

-- 
Måns Nilsson            Systems Specialist
+46 70 681 7204         KTHNOC  MN1334-RIPE

We're sysadmins. To us, data is a protocol-overhead.

Attachment: pgp00002.pgp
Description: PGP signature