About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: [ipv6-wg@localhost] IXP networks routing / IXP membership

  • To: Stefan Wahl < >
    < >
    < >
  • From: Arien Vijn < >
  • Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 10:37:27 +0100

On 02-03-2003 16:12PM, "Stefan Wahl" swahl@localhost wrote:

>> I also believe in the RIPE-NCC to be able to distinguish between
> enterprises that
>> might request a status of an IXP. It all depends of the policy and
> conditions.
> This is very simple. Have a lock at the peering matrix and you can
> distinguish between a enterprise and an IXP (or am i wrong here?).

Well the fears are probably not concerning existing IXPs. The fear is that
setting up an (fake) IXP becomes a way to get independent address space.

Naturally, we do not want to create a chicken and egg situation when you
limit "IXP-space" to well established IXPs only.

Arien





  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community