About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

RE: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

  • To: Geoff Huston < >
  • From: Anne Lord < >
  • Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:31:49 +1000 (EST)
  • Cc: Guy Davies < >

Hi Geoff,

> For me these two phrases, DELEGATED-TO-LIR and
> ASSIGNED-TO-END-USER, hit the spot precisely!
> 
> excellent suggestion Guy!
> 
> Is it appropriate to request consideration of these terms as replacements
> for ASSIGNED and ALLOCATED?
  
The terms in the database in connection with this attribute are 
used to reflect the existing policy environment. If you wish to change 
the terms, then the appropriate place to do that (in the AP region) is 
the Address Policy SIG. You are very welcome to make a proposal there. 

cheers,

Anne
--





  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community