About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: 90 IPv6 sub-TLA allocations made

  • To: Stephen Burley < >
  • From: Peter Willis < >
  • Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 14:40:44 +0100
  • Cc: lir-wg < >
    ipv6-wg < >

> This is not including the needed aggregation for multi-national registries,
> its fine for a single network but, still would tie your hands when
> sub-allocating to multiple LIR's.

This is simply accomodated by mutliplying the maximum utilisation figure by 
0.75 for every layer of hierarchy or aggregation in the network. So for
a 3 layer network plus another layer for international aggregation the
maximum utilisation falls to 0.75^4=0.316 == 32%.

This is the theoritical maximum address utilisation that can be achieved 
without breaking aggregates. 

I think we should penalize anyone who gets a better address utilisation than 
this because they are obviously announcing more routes than they need to ;-)

Peter.





  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community