Re: 90 IPv6 sub-TLA allocations made

[Gert Doering <]

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 03:39:56PM +0100, Stephen Burley wrote:
> Will the new draft include the priciple of MIR's which i detailed on the
> list (which stangly got no negative response) and will it also understand
> the concept of sub-allocation?

Without knowing anything about that draft :-) I can only speculate.

On the concept of MIRs - I don't think they are necessary.  This is 
something that a LIR should do internally - and this means the
concept of sub-allocation should be legalized (and formalized) now.  

LIRs already do sub-allocations, because it's necessary. The hostmasters 
know this, but frown on it, because it's not in the official policies.  
So let's change 'em (at least for IPv6, where aggregation is MUCH more 
important than conservation).

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299