Re: agenda (v2) for IPv6 working group RIPE35

["Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" <]

  Dear IPv6 WG!

>Below follows the second version of the IPv6 wg agenda.

[ snip ]

>B.  Comments on the Provisional Assignment on Allocation of IPv6
>    addresses document (ipv6-wg & lir-wg)
>    - Why is a dial-up link treated differently - should
>      such users get a /48 or a /64 ?!?
>    - Public or private addresses recommendation for point-to-point
>      links
>    - What constitutes 80% utilization ?!?  

  I'd really like to recommend to all of you to review the message 
  with feedback from the Co-Chairs of the IETF IPng Working Group 
  and the NGTrans Working Group chairs.

  	  as distributed on Mon, 31 Jan 2000 15:27:47 +0100
  	  by Mirjam Kuehne mir@localhost
  	  to ipv6-wg@localhost
  	  subject: FYI - Re: IPv6 Policy Document Review
	  
  Regards,
  Wilfried.
 _______________________________________________________________________
  Wilfried Woeber                 : e-mail: Woeber@localhost
  UniVie Computer Center - ACOnet : Tel: +43 1 4277 - 140 33
  Universitaetsstrasse 7          : Fax: +43 1 4277 - 9 140
  A-1010 Vienna, Austria, Europe  : RIPE-DB: WW144, PGP keyID 0xF0ACB369
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  First things first, but not necessarily in that order....