Re: new IPv6 policy draft - real soon now

|   From 6bone-owner@localhost Thu Apr 15 14:55 MET 1999

|   
|   >   * The biggest concern left was the slow start procedure within the sTLA.
|   >   * It was discussed at length but no agreement could be reached. The
|   >   * registries want to have some kind of control against allocations that
|   >   * are given out that are not used as they are supposed to be used, while
|   > 
|   > One other reason is that if all organisations/networks have the same
|   > prefix length ISPs will have difficulties to make rationale routing
|   > decisions if that may be necessary in the future.
|   
|   Well hang on a moment. sTLAs are intended for ISPs and exchange
|   points, and we're expecting them all to show up in the default-free
|   table. I don't see your point.
|   


====BT: moreover, one can imagine carriers will be able to aggregate ISPs prefixes.
	If they've got different legnth ones, I don't know how to achieve this.
	

  +bernard Tuy.