About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: new IPv6 policy draft - real soon now

  • To: Mirjam Kuehne < >
  • From: Brian E Carpenter < >
  • Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 13:48:12 +0100
  • Cc: David Kessens < >
    Philip Smith < >
  • Organization: IBM Internet Division

>   * The biggest concern left was the slow start procedure within the sTLA.
>   * It was discussed at length but no agreement could be reached. The
>   * registries want to have some kind of control against allocations that
>   * are given out that are not used as they are supposed to be used, while
> 
> One other reason is that if all organisations/networks have the same
> prefix length ISPs will have difficulties to make rationale routing
> decisions if that may be necessary in the future.

Well hang on a moment. sTLAs are intended for ISPs and exchange
points, and we're expecting them all to show up in the default-free
table. I don't see your point.

  Brian





  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community