About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

[kato@localhost: Re: Meeting on IPv6 Address Allocation Policy]

  • From: David Kessens < >
  • Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 18:43:28 -0700

For those of you attending the next IETF meeting:

----- Forwarded message from Akira Kato kato@localhost -----

To: 6bone@localhost
Subject: Re: Meeting on  IPv6 Address Allocation Policy
From: Akira Kato kato@localhost
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:48:50 +0900

I sent the pre-announcement attached below in Mar 07 afternoon. I
got positive responses from at least two Regional Registries and I
would like to confirm the meeting:

It will be held as below:
   March 16 (TUE), 11:30 -- 12:30 in Room Salon G
           (-- 11:15, the first NGtrans meeting held in the same room

The purpose of the meeting is *not* to bash the registries but to
- Demonstrate how we are requiring IPv6 address space,
- Understand the current situation of each Regional Registry,
- Find out what kind of help from IPv6 community to the registries
  is needed to expedite the allocation process,
- so on.

Note that we will only have only 1 hour slot. So please understand
that we can not discuss the issues in detail. Also please read the
IPv6 Address Allocation Policy in advance.

See you soon in Minneapolis!

-- Akira Kato, WIDE Project

> Folks,
> 
> The Regional Registries (ARIN, RIPE/NCC, APNIC) is about to define the
> IPv6 address allocation policy. Their current draft may be referred
> from your regional registries. In the case of APNIC, you can get
> through the URL below:
> 	http://www.apnic.net/ipv6draft.html
> 
> The registries held a meeting to discuss the guidelines last week in
> Singapore (in conjunction with Apricot'99) and some IPv6 people have
> been invited to the meeting. Althrough I was not able to attend it,
> a quick report from my colleague said that there was some discussion
> on the current bootstrap condition which requires an IPv6 (s)TLA
> applicant should have at least 100 non-dialup customers (corresponding
> to the 8th paragraph of 4.1.1 in the case of APNIC draft).
> 
> One of the conclusion of the meeting was to hold a continuous
> discussion during the Minnepolis IETF meeting. Current candidate
> timeslot is just after the first NGtrans session is over (March 16 (TUE)
> 11:30 -- 12:30, in Room Salon G).
> 
> Please note that the above schedule is tentative and may be changed or
> even entirely cancelled. Those who are interested to participate it,
> please stay tuned.
> 
> -- Akira Kato, WIDE Project

----- End forwarded message -----

David K.
---





  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community