Re: IPv6 ASSIGNMENT AND ALLOCATION POLICY DOCUMENT (3rd draft)

[Bob Fink <]

Bernard,

At 04:21 PM 2/18/99 +0100, Bernard TUY wrote:
>|   Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 16:45:46 -0700
>|   From: David Kessens david@localhost
>|   
>|   Included below are the comments from the IAB on the 'IPv6 ASSIGNMENT
>|   AND ALLOCATION POLICY DOCUMENT (3rd draft)'.
>|   
>|   I personnally think that the IAB's comments are pretty close to the
>|   suggestions that the wg decided on during the RIPE IPv6 wg session in
>|   Amsterdam.
>
>====BT: If I agree with David's comment above and with the IAB answer to the 
>document,
>	a question remains :
>	
>	-what will be now the procedure(s) to get an "operational" document ?
>	
>	Do we have -still- to wait a long time, before official allocation will
start ?
>	One could argue nothing is urgent still no networks are ready to deploy for
>	production traffic yet. But it's again a "chicken & egg" problem ... ?

I would note that the following organizations have (some as long ago as
last August) requested Sub-TLAs from their respective regional address
registry, and have been put on hold by the given registry with the basic
explanation that they aren't ready to assign yet. There may be others that
I don't know of.

	ESNET, CANARIE, MCI/vBNS, WIDE, UUNET-UK, NTT, SPRINT.


Bob