About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: proposal for RIPE's IPv6-address space structure

  • To: Frank Hoffmeister < >
  • From: Daniel Karrenberg < >
  • Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 17:33:22 +0100
  • Cc: "Matt Fakray" < >

  > Frank Hoffmeister <Frank.Hoffmeister@localhost writes:
  > 
  > This is in line with the proposal.
  > Even for internal use only, country related address blocks are handy for
  > daily operations. The customers of multinational providers get
  > nationalized addresses for the ease of internal and external routing
  > (local peerings). Since each multinational vendor has a local company
  > for operations having a country-related address block like any other
  > (national) provider is perfectly in line.

I agree if you use local in place of national and country.
I pertinently do not agree if you confuse network topology with
national borders. Grouping by country is not useful. Grouping by provider 
is. Sub-grouping within a provider can be.

Daniel




  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community