Re: proposal for RIPE's IPv6-address space structure
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 14:16:39 +0100 (MET)
Hi Pedro,
> >>>>> "JOIN" == JOIN Project Team join@localhost writes:
>
>
> JOIN> PRID (Provider Region ID) 7 bit corresponds to 128
> JOIN> IDs. These are mainly reserved for the countries of the
> JOIN> 'natural', ie. European, RIPE-Region (A5). Non-European
> JOIN> domains supported by RIPE get their own prefix (FP+RegID) in
> JOIN> order to support a dedicated authority for these regions in
> JOIN> the future.
>
> JOIN> We should mention that we have discussed the possibility to
> JOIN> subdivide the RIPE address space in such a way that the
> JOIN> length of the Country-ID depends on the size (population) of
> JOIN> that country. In such a scheme big countries could get a 5
> JOIN> or 6 bit long Country-ID (instead of 7 bit), resulting in a
> JOIN> larger address space for those countries.
>
> Could you clarify a bit the Region ID field ...
> i.e. is there supposed to be a region id per country ?
Yes, so it is. But with less than 60 countries within the European
RIPE region many PRIDs will remain which may be used for pan-european
organizations and other things.
> what about pan-european organizations (E-bone, EUnet, Dante and so on) ?
> Do they get the region of the country where their head-quarters is or
> a special "all-europe region" ?
See above.
> Do you intend to have address assignment made "provider based" or
> "geographically based" ?
We intend to have address assignment "provider based".
> i.e. where would EUnet PT get his prefix, for instance ? from the
> "europe-wide" or "Holland" region or from "portuguese" region ?
This depends on whether EUnet PT regards itself as part of a
pan-european EUnet provider or as independent Portuguese service
provider.
>
> Note that this is not criticism to the idea... i just think these points
> could/should be addresses more clearly in the document.
I hope, our points got clear.
>
> regards,
> Pedro.
>
>
Regards,
Guido
|