|
|
 |
Re: The Cidr Report
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 20:53:57 +1000
Yes, it was an old message which got resent for some reason when the box
restarted.
The workstation is back on line, and the Friday report should reappear as
normal. Last night's run worked just fine, with the results on the CIDR
Report webpage http://www.employees.org/~tbates/cidr-report.html
Thanks to everyone who let us know there was a problem... :-)
philip
--
At 11:57 15/01/2002 -0500, Joe Abley wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 09:21:07AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2001, Tony Bates wrote:
>
> Something wrong here. Today is not May 25 and we *never* see a drop of 3K
> prefixes. -Hank
The mail was delayed for about 10 months (on lovefm.cisco.com, looks
like). Either that, or the dates in the received headers are wrong,
and various cisco machines have consistently wacky ideas about what
the current date is.
> > This is an auto-generated mail on Fri May 25 23:00:00 PDT 2001
> > It is not checked before it leaves my workstation.However, hopefully
> > you will find this report interesting and will take the time to look
> > through this to see if you can improve theamount of aggregation you
> > perform.
Joe
|
|
|
|
