Re: Thoughts on Renumbering? (Re: Criteria iPA-A) (both IPv4 and IPv6)
- Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 08:13:26 +0200
On 2001-05-28T08:37:49,
Aleksi Suhonen ripe-mailing-lists@localhost said:
> Changing the name servers for the forward mapping is what I see
> as the problem here. Just a few years ago changing the name
> servers for a SLD of a gTLD was a headache and while that may
> have become easier now, the different ccTLDs will continue to
> have different types of procedures and response times for
> requests of this sort. Even a small ISP can easily have hosted
> domains in half a dozen different TLDs and going through them
> all and getting all the relevant name servers changed in them
> in a timely fashion can be a formidable task.
I would agree - when we (at that time, de.teutonet) converted a few years ago,
this was an amazing overhead, having to go through all the small local NICs.
Unfortunately, a global search & replace for DNS related entries doesn't exist
;-)
The rest of the transition went rather smoothly - renumbering DNS records
themselves was a mere UPDATE statement for our database, and renumbering the
hosts themselves - while truely annoying and sometimes boring - was painless.
We went through this rather quickly, configuring both netblocks in parallel,
moving DNS, waiting for it to propagate + a little bit longer to be really
sure ;), and then turned of the old block.
The other major issue which crept up was having to reconfigure VPNs and
firewalls - but I don't see a practical way to solve this.
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brie lmb@localhost
--
Perfection is our goal, excellence will be tolerated. -- J. Yahl
|