Archive: enum-wg@ripe.net/2009

All Archives / enum-wg / 2009 / Author | Chronological | Subject | Thread

• Christoph Künkel
  • AW: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? (30 June 2009)
  • AW: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? (07 July 2009)
• Eduardo Júnior
  • [enum-wg] DNS Server (20 January 2009)
  • [enum-wg] Query statistics (07 November 2009)
• Patrik Fältström
  • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? (30 June 2009)
• Alexander Mayrhofer
  • [enum-wg] issues with tinnie.arin.net? (08 September 2009)
• Anand Buddhdev
  • [enum-wg] Re: Query statistics for e164.arpa on ns-pri.ripe.net (23 April 2009)
  • [enum-wg] Re: Query statistics for e164.arpa on ns-pri.ripe.net (27 April 2009)
• Andrzej Bartosiewicz
  • RE: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? (23 June 2009)
  • RE: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? (23 June 2009)
• Antoin Verschuren
  • RE: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? (30 June 2009)
  • RE: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? (01 July 2009)
  • RE: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? (01 July 2009)
  • RE: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? (01 July 2009)
  • RE: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? (02 July 2009)
  • [enum-wg] DNSSEC for 1.3.e164.arpa (06 July 2009)
• Carsten Schiefner
  • [enum-wg] RIPE 58 ENUM WG: Draft Agenda (27 April 2009)
  • Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? (25 June 2009)
  • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? (18 July 2009)
  • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? (18 July 2009)
  • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? (22 July 2009)
  • [enum-wg] DRAFT Minutes of ENUM-WG session at RIPE 58 are available (28 July 2009)
  • [enum-wg] First call for RIPE 59 ENUM WG agenda (27 August 2009)
  • [enum-wg] regular statistics also on non-delegated E.164 country codes? (27 August 2009)
  • Re: [enum-wg] DRAFT Minutes of ENUM-WG session at RIPE 58 are available (02 September 2009)
  • [enum-wg] Second call for RIPE 59 ENUM WG agenda (04 September 2009)
  • Re: [enum-wg] British Telecom ENUM service??? (07 October 2009)
  • Re: [enum-wg] British Telecom ENUM service??? (07 October 2009)
  • [enum-wg] Start of the ENUM WG session at RIPE 59 on Friday (07 October 2009)
• Christian de Larrinaga
  • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? (30 June 2009)
  • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? (19 July 2009)
  • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? (27 July 2009)
  • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business c ase matter? (28 July 2009)
• Esther Makaay
  • RE: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? (03 July 2009)
  • RE: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? (03 July 2009)
• Florian Weimer
  • [enum-wg] Query statistics for e164.arpa on ns-pri.ripe.net (22 April 2009)
  • [enum-wg] Re: Query statistics for e164.arpa on ns-pri.ripe.net (27 April 2009)
  • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? (30 June 2009)
  • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? (30 June 2009)
  • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? (01 July 2009)
  • Re: [enum-wg] regular statistics also on non-delegated E.164 country codes? (27 August 2009)
• Jaap Akkerhuis
  • Re: [enum-wg] DNS Server (21 January 2009)
• Jim Reid
  • Re: [enum-wg] DNS Server (20 January 2009)
  • Re: [enum-wg] DNS Server (20 January 2009)
  • [enum-wg] CRUE (27 July 2009)