Re: [enum-wg] Name "ripe" in the e164.arpa zone
-
To: brett brett@localhost
-
From: Patrik Fältström paf@localhost
-
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:39:14 +0100
-
Authentication-results: ams-dkim-2; header.From=paf@localhost dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim2001 verified; );
-
Cc: "Jim Reid" jim@localhost, "Anand Buddhdev" anandb@localhost, enum-wg@localhost
-
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=486; t=1200828159; x=1201692159; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=paf@localhost z=From:=20=3D?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=3DE4ltstr=3DF6m?=3D=20<p af@localhost |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[enum-wg]=20Name=20=22ripe=22=20in=20th e=20e164.arpa=20zone |Sender:=20; bh=smT6/88j8sFmQRCV7YTZT0cvQnE7OOj35WzwDiM7yOk=; b=J0VObBqbIf1UPWpNHxdghH7TJWfTlL4HMFkkXx8j1aty18hkU4a5h0/LTf ZvzStsvQ1DDID5Muv0Q89TwhFrTLhCpLA2kbGJsjNlpArD45g+iMtj9y7vjP 4nMQOjG7wa;
On 17 jan 2008, at 19.50, brett wrote:
I wonder what will happen if the ITU one day decides
that "ripe.e164.arpa" should be delegated to someone....
Don't think this would cause a problem would it, as this is only a TXT
record I think it could quite happily co-exist with some NS records.
No, as it in that case should reside in the child zone, and not parent
zone.
That said, I am on the same side as John and others regarding this
issue.
Patrik
|
you are here: RIPE -> RIPE Maillists > Archives
