[enum-wg] Session scheduling for RIPE 55 (and future): ENUM vs AP

[Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@localhost]

From the current draft minutes from RIPE 54:

Y. A.O.B.

Niall explained that there is pressure to provide more space for the  
Address Policy WG, and the suggestion was made that there are some  
WGs whose communities are not be very interested in AP. Are there  
people here who wouldn't mind this session being parallel to AP.
Carsten asked if Niall could send this to the list.
ACTION 54.3: Niall O'Reilly to ask mailing list about having the ENUM  
WG session in parallel with the AP WG session at future RIPE Meetings.

	The meeting plan for RIPE 55 is currently being discussed among the WG

	Chairs and the NCC.  As of the current draft, scheduling ENUM and  
Address
	Policy in parallel seems not to be under consideration, but re- 
arrangement
	to deal with other conflicts is likely and may change this.



	Please speak up, anyone for whom simultaneous scheduling of ENUM and

	Address Policy WG sessions would be a problem.



Best regards,

Niall O'Reilly
Co-Chair, RIPE ENUM Working Group

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part