|
|
 |
Re: [enum-wg] Document on good Tier-1 DNS practice
-
To: Jim Reid jim@localhost
-
From: Carsten Schiefner <enumvoipsip.cs@localhost
-
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 08:33:19 +0100
-
Cc: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@localhost, Stastny Richard <Richard.Stastny@localhost, Michael Haberler mah@localhost, John C Klensin john+ietf@localhost, Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists@localhost, enum-wg@localhost
Jim, all -
Jim Reid wrote:
On Nov 17, 2006, at 15:00, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
Of course not. Although that _is_ what Jim suggested (see above),
I'ld like
to believe he was using the phrase as a kind of shorthand, and meant
something
different, but related, and IMHO actually useful.
That's *exactly* what I was suggesting.
Another "good DNS practice" document will simply not be worth the effort.
The people who might read it know it already; those who should _need_ to
read it won't have their radar pointing in the right direction.
A document on "good ENUM Tier-1 practice", if it were available, would be
something to which the RIPE NCC could _respectfully_ draw the
attention of
new (or not-yet-alerted) Tier-1 operators.
Indeed. This hypothetical RIPE document might even be thrown over the
wall to ITU SG2 as a contribution.
... and this pretty much seems to be in line with what we were talking
about at RIPE 53 under the agenda item "Quality Task Force". :-)
The action item is on me to gather more input and to report back
("Ongoing work, progress will be reported at RIPE 54 or also inbetween
if necessary"); cf.
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-53/presentations/enu-cs-qtf.pdf .
Best,
-C.
|
|
|
|
