Re: [enum-wg] 9.3.e164.arpa down
-
To: "Jim Reid" jim@localhost, "Michael Haberler" mah@localhost
-
From: "Stastny Richard" <Richard.Stastny@localhost
-
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 16:34:48 +0100
-
Cc: "John C Klensin" john+ietf@localhost, "Klaus Darilion" <klaus.mailinglists@localhost, enum-wg@localhost
> As far as the
>ITU is concerned, ENUM delegations have been made under interim
>procedures on the understanding that this was for trials, not
>production services.
Jim, you are wrong here. The "Interim Procedures" state nowhere that
they are "only for trials"
>I strongly urge *everyone* to not rock the boat here.
I agree we should be careful how we proceed with this issue not
to awake sleeping lions, some people in ITU-T are wating for
something like this to happen.
OTOH, you approach to simple state that sh*t happens is also
not feasable. IMO RIPE should first look what can be done and
Michaels proposals should at least be taken into account
Richard
.
|
you are here: RIPE -> RIPE Maillists > Archives
