Re: [enum-wg] Proposal for new org-type

[Carsten Schiefner <enumvoipsip.cs@localhost]

Dmitriy, all -

Dmitriy V Menzulskiy wrote:
> Alireza Saleh написано 04.10.2006 12:23:44:
>  > ENUM-REGISTRY or any other terms is good, but, I think it would be
>  > better to follow the hierarchy model. Having REGISTRY at the top and
>  > more specific label such as org-detail: to describe the what kind of
>  > registry  as a child.
>
> I think, it's good idea:
>
> REGISTRY-IANA
> REGISTRY-RIR
> REGISTRY-NIR
> REGISTRY-LIR
> REGISTRY-ENUM
> REGISTRY-OTHER
> NON-REGISTRY
>
> WBR,
>
> Dmitry Menzulskiy
> "VimpelCom" JSC
> DM3740-RIPE
I believe we should keep things as simple as possible - and according to 
what's been discussed here on the list and during the session last week, 
the proposed "OTHER" seems to address everybody's need.
Having said that, I'd like to reiterate Niall's call of Wed 4 Oct 2006, 
15:07 UTC:
===
I will declare consensus in the ENUM WG unless objections to Antoin's 
proposal are posted on the ENUM WG mailing list before 12:00 UTC on 
Thursday, 18 October 2006.
===

Best regards,

	Carsten