Re: [enum-wg] ENUM-capable email client?
-
To: Peter Koch <>
-
From: Florian Weimer <>
-
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:08:50 +0200
* Peter Koch:
> It should not. Last news about the necessary A RR for "." came from a parallel
> universe and draft-delany-nullmx-00.txt just misses the operational
> consequences. Using the "@e164.arpa" part to deviate from the standard mail
> routing algorithm won't fly.
What about reusing the TPC.INT approach?
(AFAIK, RegTP forbids adding MX records under 9.4.e164.arpa, but this
impossible to enforce, of course. 8-)
|
you are here: RIPE -> RIPE Maillists > Archives
