About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

RE: [enum-wg] "production status"?

  • To: Stastny Richard <
    >
  • From: Andrzej Bartosiewicz <
    >
  • Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 11:40:08 +0200 (CEST)
  • Cc: Adrian Georgescu <
    >,
  • Virusprotection: checked - Found to be clean

Richard,

I understand your concerns. I agree with you but:
According to our Telecommuniaction Law numbers are assigned to Operators
by Regulator and Subscriber (end-user) rights are explicity enumerated
including the right for changing the number and geographical and service
provider portability). Subscriber has no other "general" rights like
"Self management of ENUM domain name corresponding to the E164 number from
within the national plan".

Neither Registry (NASK) nor the Regulator have legal power to allow
direct registration of ENUM domain names by the Subscribers (end-users).

Coming back to NP problem:

> what is strange in Poland is
> > Operator A has registerd in DNS "1000" E164 number
> > (0.0.0.1.<cc>.e164.arpa) for his customer C.
>
> If customer C registered the "1000" number by himself,
> as everywhere else,
> the whole problem would not exist.

If the full E164 numbers (*not the number blocks*) are subject of
registration there is no problem with NP.
In our case where subscriber can not register directly, there is no
problem with NP.

Andrzej.




 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community