About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [enum-wg] "production status"?

  • To: Adrian Georgescu <
    >
  • From: Andrzej Bartosiewicz <
    >
  • Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 11:16:28 +0200 (CEST)
  • Virusprotection: checked - Found to be clean

Let's imaging the following situation.

Operator A has registerd in the central database numbering block 1XXX
(1.<cc>.e164.arpa.)

Operator A has registerd in DNS "1000" E164 number
(0.0.0.1.<cc>.e164.arpa) for his customer C.

NP is implemented and customer C is porting his number from Operator A to
Operator B

Finally, customer C is the B's customer for "1000" number and the same
time the (lifelong) Registrar of ENUM number "1000" is... Operator A.

Customer C MUST always contact Operator A.

What happens in case of A bankruptcy?

It sounds strange.

Andrzej.

On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Adrian Georgescu wrote:

> Andrzej,
>
> I cannot imagine how ENUM registrations could be "canceled", as the
> numbers are delegated based on current administrative policies in
> place.
> Should NP be implemented, ENUM can be an enabler. With fixed numbering
> plans like in .ro delegation of each individual number is possible.
>
> Adrian
>
> On Jun 3, 2005, at 10:49 AM, Andrzej Bartosiewicz wrote:
>
> > As I understand ENUM Registry MUST canclel/terminate all the ENUM
> > registration of the numbering blocks after NP implementation in
> > Romania.
> >
> > Additionally Registry should "transfer" all the ENUM domain names from
> > the
> > Registrars (Operators) to the Registry. Am I right?
> >
> > Andrzej
> >
> > On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Adrian Georgescu wrote:
> >
> >> Number portability is not possible at this moment, there are plans for
> >> the near future.
> >>
> >> On Jun 3, 2005, at 10:13 AM, Andrzej Bartosiewicz wrote:
> >>
> >>> Adrian,
> >>>
> >>>> In Romania operators may apply for entering number ranges that are
> >>>> assigned by the telecom regulator under +40 also into e164.arpa.
> >>>> name
> >>>> space. The operator than assigns the numbers to its customers based
> >>>> on
> >>>> internal procedures.
> >>>
> >>> It lookas like that Number Portability can not be implemented in
> >>> Romania.
> >>> What happens if the number range is assigned to operator and after
> >>> that
> >>> some numbers are ported to anoter operator.
> >>>
> >>> Andrzej.
> >>
>




 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community