Re: [enum-wg] Austria starts with the ENUM-based number range

[Carsten Schiefner <]

[Trimmed to enum-wg@localhost only, because of irrelevance to the ENUM 
protocol itself]

Hi Richard,

Stastny Richard wrote:
> - subscribers must have
>    [ ] Austrian citizenship
>    [ ] Austrian residency
>    [ X] neither one, ie. it's gobally open
cool - so all registrars listed here: 
http://www.enum.at/index.php?id=64&L=9 would help me out?

> - registrars must
> [...]
>
> The definition of a communication service provider is different from
> a normal telco, and is also not restricted to Austrian company
> (This wiould not work anyway in the EU)
True, but such rules wouldn't be there nonetheless for the first time - 
and for sure not for the last time either... Whatever the rationale 
behind such action might be.

> - To what extend NP is implemented?
>
> ?
> What kind of NP do you mean?
>
> Porting ENUM domains from one registrar to the other? -yes
> Porting ENUM doamins from one Name server to the other? -yes
> Pointing the NAPTR to another sip URI? -yes
Porting the E.164 number in the PSTN world from one operator to the 
next, as the latter has much better break-out rates, for example. Or 
would that be entirely opaque to the subscriber as she deasls with a 
communication service provider only anyways?

Thanks a lot - and best,

	-C.