Maillist Archive: enum-wg@ripe.net/2005

All Archives / enum-wg / 2005 / Author | Chronological | Subject | Thread

• 01 September 2005
  • [enum-wg] RIPE Policy Development Process Paul Rendek
• 27 July 2005
  • [enum-wg] New ENUM software available from .nz Alexander Mayrhofer
• 11 July 2005
  • [enum-wg] Fwd: New I/D concerning ENUM validation architecture submitted Bernie Hoeneisen
  • RE: [enum-wg] Links to country web pages concerning ENUM activiti es Arunas Silinis
  • RE: [enum-wg] Links to country web pages concerning ENUM activities Arunas Silinis
• 08 July 2005
  • RE: [enum-wg] Links to country web pages concerning ENUM activities Bernie Hoeneisen
• 07 July 2005
  • Re: [enum-wg] Links to country web pages concerning ENUM activities Bernie Hoeneisen
  • [enum-wg] Links to country web pages concerning ENUM activities Arunas Silinis
• 06 July 2005
  • Re: [enum-wg] Links to country web pages concerning ENUM activities, enum@localhost HiroHOTTA
  • [enum-wg] Links to country web pages concerning ENUM activities , enum@localhost
• 23 June 2005
  • CORRECTION: [enum-wg] Call for RIPE 51(!) agenda topics Carsten Schiefner
  • [enum-wg] Call for RIPE 50 agenda topics Carsten Schiefner
• 21 June 2005
  • Re: [enum-wg] FYI: new list for ENUM +353 Interest Group Jim Reid
  • Re: [enum-wg] FYI: new list for ENUM +353 Interest Group Niall O'Reilly
  • Re: [enum-wg] FYI: new list for ENUM +353 Interest Group Jim Reid
• 21 June 2005
  • [enum-wg] FYI: new list for ENUM +353 Interest Group Niall O'Reilly
• 13 June 2005
  • Re: [enum-wg] Discuss: draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-01 Bernie Hoeneisen
• 09 June 2005
  • [enum-wg] ENUM WG draft minutes RIPE 50 rev. 1 Carsten Schiefner
• 07 June 2005
  • Re: [enum-wg] Discuss: draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-01 Bernie Hoeneisen
  • Re: [enum-wg] Discuss: draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-01 Stastny Richard
  • Re: [enum-wg] Discuss: draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-01 Andrzej Bartosiewicz
  • Re: [enum-wg] Discuss: draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-01 Bernie Hoeneisen
  • Re: [enum-wg] Discuss: draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-01 Alexander Mayrhofer
  • Re: [enum-wg] Discuss: draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-01 Andrzej Bartosiewicz
• 06 June 2005
  • Re: [enum-wg] Discuss: draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-01 Edward Lewis
  • Re: [enum-wg] Discuss: draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-01 Robert Schafer
  • Re: [enum-wg] Discuss: draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-01 Adrian Georgescu
  • [enum-wg] Discuss: draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-01 Bernie Hoeneisen
• 03 June 2005
  • RE: [enum-wg] "production status"? Andrzej Bartosiewicz
  • RE: [enum-wg] "production status"? Stastny Richard
  • Re: [enum-wg] "production status"? Andrzej Bartosiewicz
  • RE: [enum-wg] "production status"? Stastny Richard
  • Re: [enum-wg] "production status"? Adrian Georgescu
  • Re: [enum-wg] "production status"? HiroHOTTA
  • SV: [enum-wg] "production status"? Joakim.Stralmark
  • Re: [enum-wg] "production status"? Andrzej Bartosiewicz
  • Re: [enum-wg] "production status"? Stastny Richard
  • Re: [enum-wg] "production status"? Alexander Mayrhofer
  • Re: [enum-wg] "production status"? Adrian Georgescu
  • Re: [enum-wg] "production status"? Andrzej Bartosiewicz
  • Re: [enum-wg] "production status"? Adrian Georgescu
  • Re: [enum-wg] "production status"? Andrzej Bartosiewicz
  • [enum-wg] "production status"? HiroHOTTA
• 31 May 2005
  • Re: [enum-wg] regulator prohibiting current practice of use of +49numbers for voip, update Andrzej Bartosiewicz
• 30 May 2005
  • Re: [enum-wg] regulator prohibiting current practice of use of +49numbers for voip, update Carsten Schiefner