About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ...

  • To: Stastny Richard < >
  • From: Andrzej Bartosiewicz < >
  • Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:37:30 +0100 (CET)
  • Cc: Richard Shockey < >
    "Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP)" < >
    Jim Reid < >
    Carsten Schiefner < >
  • Virusprotection: checked - Found to be clean

Richard,

> Ha! This was exactly the reason why ETSI decided two years ago in
> ETSI TS 102 051 "ENUM Administration in Europe" that there should
> be an alternative way to get ENUM delegations if your TSP will not
> do it. The possibility to port your number to a TSP providing ENUM
> was NOT considered a proper alternative.

You are right.

It's hard to say but we are in quite difficult situation with User ENUM in
Poland, regardless of NASK's readiness for ENUM domains registration and
Regulator consent to the solution.

-End-user MUST go throug the telco to get the ENUM domain
-Telco can reject the number porting request because of "lack of technical
ability to port the number" (we have 24 million mobile and 14 million fix
numbers and... not a single one has been ported)
-Regulator is not willing to assign the numbering blocks for VoIP

Andrzej.



<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community