Re: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ...

[Richard Shockey <]

At 04:41 AM 12/12/2004, Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP) wrote:

> Hi Jim, Richard, Andrzej, Carsten, Folks,
>
>   Andrzej does have a production system up and running, which is a
> heck of a lot faster than some countries.
Its easy when you can start from scratch and have intelligent and 
sympathetic regulators.


> It's a shame if an end user (you know, the person who pays for all these
> high quality services) can't choose their own ENUM entries. However, that's
> no change from the current situation, so maybe this is no big deal.
This IMHO will cause Poland a problem over time as ISP who want to sell 
advanced services then realize they have to go through the incumbent to get 
registrations processed. But this is as we all know is a national matter 
and seeing how Poland deals with this will be very interesting to watch.


> Poland has also avoided the hoops over Authentication that have hypnotised
> other Countries. I am a little concerned that any TSP can register any number,
> but that's something for them to argue about amongst themselves.
Authentication is not hard if your country has independent databases that 
can confirm the number holder. North America will not have that problem.


> The only way we could have a more efficient system is to de-couple telephone
> number service provision from eligibility for registration entirely - say, if
> some named person or organisation had the delegation for a CC, and then chose
> their own policy on who got what.
Or make all the service providers all go back to the ITU and get e164.int 
so they can do their own thing and not bother the rest of us.

Or they could use existing LNP databases ... ( ok that sounds really self 
serving )

Its my intention to have some sort of ID on Infrastructure TN2URI issues 
available shortly but I've been completely tied up here with US service 
providers who have begun to wake up to the fact that the lights they see in 
the distance really is a freight train. [news item below]

Note here 70% of US consumers who switch to Cable Based VoIP telephony 
actually port their primary number.

IFrom: "Bourkoff, Aryeh" <aryeh.bourkoff@localhost
To: "Bourkoff, Aryeh" <Aryeh.Bourkoff@localhost
Cc: abourkoff@localhost
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Dec 2004 15:02:28.0767 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[19D062F0:01C4DE00]
Sender: owner-ml-stm-Aryeh-Telecom-ext@localhost
Precedence: bulk
X-UBS-Disclaimer: Version $Revision: 1.26 $
X-IMAPbase: 1100136599 4982
Status: O
X-UID: 4977
Content-Length: 80823
X-Keywords: 


Time Warner Cable: Takeaways - 32nd Annual UBS Global Media Week Conf

* Time Warner Cable: Presentation at Media Week
Today, Time Warner Cable Chairman & CEO Glenn Britt, presented at UBS' 32nd 
Annual Media Week Conference.

* VoIP Rollout On Track, Anticipate 200K YE Subs
VoIP has been launched in 30 of 31 systems & remains on track for YE04 full 
rollout, with est'd cap investment ~50% lower vs. circuit switched. Mgmt 
expects 200K YE subs, & is approaching 10K weekly adds. 75% of new phone 
customers are porting numbers, indicating a switch of primary lines.


> At least we would be saved from the endless discussions on industry 
> self-regulation
> and policy advisory groups (plus their membership, whether or not they are
> representative, and the powers of the groups).
>
> At present, I can't officially register "my" ENUM in a production system.
> If someone else registers it (or a TSP registers it) I can't either. 
> What's the
> difference (apart from years of fruitful discussion on the interpretation 
> of the
> framework directives and whether they apply to a DNS system or IP addresses)?
>
> all the best,
>   Lawrence
>
> On 12 Dec 2004, at 09:03, Jim Reid wrote:
> > > > > > > "Richard" == Stastny Richard <Richard.Stastny@localhost writes:
> >     Richard> There is only one "minor" problem with the implementation
> >     Richard> in Poland: It is Carrier E**M in e164.arpa
> >
> > And the problem is......? IMO the only potential problem with this is
> > that private data could be made public through the DNS.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Initiatives
> NeuStar Inc.
> 46000 Center Oak Plaza  -   Sterling, VA  20166
> sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org   sip:57141@localhost
> ENUM +87810-13313-31331
> PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683,  Fax: +1 
> 815.333.1237
> <mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> or <mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz>
> <http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<