About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: [enum-wg] Meanwhile back in good ol' Germany

  • To: "John-Erik Horn" < >
  • From: Adrian Georgescu < >
  • Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:57:52 +0200

On Oct 20, 2004, at 9:46 AM, John-Erik Horn wrote:

I tend to agree with Thilo.
Does anyone really believe that an incumbent telco
is going to "hurry up" and implement a brand new prefix
and enable an innovative service to its own economic disadvantage?
The only way to keep a telco business running is to invest in the future. No teleco will sell the same services of today in 5 years time. So by cannibalizing parts of revenue (which you can very well compensate by optimizing costs and gaining revenues form the new services) for new technologies you guarantee the survival of your telecom company.

On the other hand are special prefixes for VoIP truly a step forward for
VoIP services?
Yes, one problem with VoIP only numbers is that the caller network must know if 1) called number is allocated and 2) where the called number is to be found VoIP/PSTN. This is critical in order to avoid routing loops. Having ENUM void service and dedicated area code for IP only solve this problems.

Or are we being misled to develop our own subculture
on the net and let ourselves become marginalized instead of truly
converging the networks which in the ultimate consequence must mean
using geographical "normal" teleophone numbers for VoIP services.
Which also means seamless transitions between networks (IP and telco).
Convergence means you have to start somewhere in a non disruptive way and find a smooth migration path. All who started with dedicated prefixes have achieved critical mass of VoIP subscribers the rest are still busy with debates.

I personally see the subjects prefix 032 (in Germany), ENUM validation and
unbundling of the local loop as smoke bombs to distract the VoIP community.
No, is a ventilation shaft being open.

It is sad that the RegTP plays along with this game.
Any of the above mentioned subjects could be solved
and/or implemented within months, not years, if there was a will.
It should but not everyone agrees to my points (they agree with you :-)


Greetz,
John-Erik Horn
VoIP Project Manager
toplink-plannet GmbH
Schönfeldstraße 8
76131 Karlsruhe
Tel: +49-721-663-6450
Fax: +49-721-663-6199
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stastny Richard" <Richard.Stastny@localhost
To: "Carsten Schiefner" <enumvoipsip.cs@localhost; enum-wg@localhost
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 4:40 AM
Subject: Re: [enum-wg] Meanwhile back in good ol' Germany


One of the major outcomes is that allocation rules for 032 national
numbers will be out as early as 24 November (this year! ;-) and that
ranges may be applied for immediately afterwards.
Really? I have heard this differently today from Thilo Salmon here at the
VON:
He said that it will take DT approx. year to have the routing for 032in
place
Richard




<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community