|
|
 |
Re: [enum-wg] DUNDi by Mark Spencer
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 05:16:29 +0200
Aside from the technical aspect (I did not try to use the protocol
myself yet) I cannot help noticing that once again technology moves
ahead quickly to solve any barriers imposed on delegation and
administration of E164 number space for VoIP. The acceptance of VoIP
addressing of E164 space can depend on formal bodies (like ENUM model)
or in this case by the fact that the installed base of Asterisk
gateways is simply able to deploy an alternative without waiting for
any green light.
As even ENUM acceptance was driven by Asterisk solution, I cannot see
what will stop DUNDI becoming a valid alternative. Perhaps the fact
that in place of, or next to, DNS servers one will need to use Asterisk
servers and routing of E164 numbers to non E164 addresses will not be
trivial.
Adrian
On Oct 20, 2004, at 1:04 AM, Carsten Schiefner wrote:
Has anybody already digested this to some extent?
Distributed Universal Number Discovery
http://www.dundi.com/
An article on it has been published today at:
http://voxilla.com/voxstory107-nested-order0-threshold0.html
Best,
-C.
|
|
|
|
