AW: AW: [enum-wg] Kapsch CarrierCom first company to be reached with ENUM (questionable)

[Christoph Künkel <]

Lawrence,

add just any extension to the trunk base number, e.g. 0.9.0.0.3.7.1.3.0.7.9.4.e164.arpa.  See the NAPTR.

However, I think you missed my point(s).  I was not going to debate wether I have a NAPTR or not.  I was just trying to make the point that the original thread implied a tight coupling between ENUM and SIP, where there is none.  And that Kapsch certainly is not the first company to be reached with ENUM.

:-) Christoph

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP) [
	    
	    
]
> Do I miss something or is this thread falsely mixing up only loosely 
> coupled issues?
>

Yes, you do miss something.