Re: AW: [enum-wg] Kapsch CarrierCom first company to be reached with ENUM (questionable)
- Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:54:18 +0100
Hi Folks,
inline
best regards,
Lawrence
On 8 Oct 2004, at 08:40, Christoph Künkel wrote:
strange.
<extract of SIP RFC elided>
no mention of ENUM.
typo - c/2/7/
also, I work in a company that has ENUM enabled. You can call me (+49
7031 73009) via ENUM from the internet and I certainly have no SIP
URI. Same goes true for a number of our customers I know of, which
are using ENUM in their telephony production environment.
Well... you have a pair of TXT record in there but no NAPTRs, AFAICS:
; <<>> DiG 9.2.2 <<>> 9.0.0.3.7.1.3.0.7.9.4.e164.arpa. NAPTR
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 43513
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
; <<>> DiG 9.2.2 <<>> 9.0.0.3.7.1.3.0.7.9.4.e164.arpa. ANY
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 62091
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 5, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 4
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;9.0.0.3.7.1.3.0.7.9.4.e164.arpa. IN ANY
;; ANSWER SECTION:
9.0.0.3.7.1.3.0.7.9.4.e164.arpa. 90 IN TXT "for the purpose of
ENUM-Trial DE"
9.0.0.3.7.1.3.0.7.9.4.e164.arpa. 90 IN TXT "innovaphone AG
administrator@localhost"
9.0.0.3.7.1.3.0.7.9.4.e164.arpa. 90 IN SOA
ns.dnsnglab.ipv6.berkom.de. wjontofs.berkom.de. 2004083001 182800 600
3600 120
9.0.0.3.7.1.3.0.7.9.4.e164.arpa. 90 IN NS
ns.dnsnglab.ipv6.berkom.de.
9.0.0.3.7.1.3.0.7.9.4.e164.arpa. 90 IN NS
ns2.dnsnglab.ipv6.berkom.de.
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
9.0.0.3.7.1.3.0.7.9.4.e164.arpa. 90 IN NS
ns2.dnsnglab.ipv6.berkom.de.
9.0.0.3.7.1.3.0.7.9.4.e164.arpa. 90 IN NS
ns.dnsnglab.ipv6.berkom.de.
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
ns.dnsnglab.ipv6.berkom.de. 3600 IN A 141.39.29.162
ns.dnsnglab.ipv6.berkom.de. 2624 IN AAAA 2001:7a0:100:111::162
ns2.dnsnglab.ipv6.berkom.de. 3600 IN A 141.39.66.111
ns2.dnsnglab.ipv6.berkom.de. 2624 IN AAAA 2001:7a0:100:101::155
Do I miss something or is this thread falsely mixing up only loosely
coupled issues?
Yes, you do miss something.
Regards, Christoph
Earlier, I said:
Hi Guys,
quick point here - ENUM is according to RFC3261.
It's AKA "public" ENUM. It *is* available on the Internet.
Anything else is "ENUM-like".
So Henry says (and I agree), if you do not have a SIP URI, you do not
have VoIP.
|