Re: [enum-wg] Kapsch CarrierCom first company to be reached withENUM (questionable)

[Carsten Schiefner <]

Christoph,

Christoph Künkel wrote:
> strange.
> I had a quick look at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3261.txt and it reads:
>
> 	Network Working Group                                       J. Rosenberg
> 	Request for Comments: 3261                                   dynamicsoft
> 	Obsoletes: 2543                                           H. Schulzrinne
> 	Category: Standards Track                                    ...
>             	                                                   June 2002
>                     SIP: Session Initiation Protocol
>
> no mention of ENUM.
ENUM is 3761 - so just one digit mixed up; and they even look almost the 
same. :-)

Happens to me all the time, too...

> also, I work in a company that has ENUM enabled.  You can call me (+49
> 7031 73009) via ENUM from the internet and I certainly have no SIP URI.
So what kind of URI you are using then - "h323:"? Or "tel:", so that it 
is about Internet->PSTN termination?

> Same goes true for a number of our customers I know of, which are using
> ENUM in their telephony production environment.  
> Do I miss something or is this thread falsely mixing up only loosely
> coupled issues?
What _exactly!_ is only loosely coupled here from you PoV?

Best,

	Carsten