Re: [enum-wg] New Subject: What ENUM wg should do...

[Patrik Fältström <]

On Aug 10, 2004, at 01:49, James Seng wrote:

> IETF or RIPE WG? I'm all for it for the latter.
RIPE-WG.

  paf

> -James Seng
>
> Jim Reid wrote:
>
> > > > > > > "paf" == =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrik F=E4ltstr=F6m?= <ISO-8859-1> 
> > > > > > > writes:
> >     paf> One of the things Kim and I have planned for this wg is to
> >     paf> keep a webpage updated with, for each CC/country, answers to
> >     paf> questions on what rules exists for various things -- one of
> >     paf> them being how integration of E.164 numbers is...
> >     paf> Does this sound like a "good thing for this wg to do"?
> > YES!