Archive: enum-wg@ripe.net/2004

All Archives / enum-wg / 2004 / Author | Chronological | Subject | Thread

• [enum-wg] Announcement: Policy Development Process in RIPE, Rob Blokzijl (21 December 2004)
  • [enum-wg] Re: [eix-wg] Announcement: Policy Development Process in RIPE, Randy Bush (22 December 2004)
• [enum-wg] ENUM Status for Ireland (+353), Niall O'Reilly (21 December 2004)
• AW: AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Stastny Richard (14 December 2004)
• [enum-wg] WG: Telephone Number assined to IP telephony in Italy?, Stastny Richard (13 December 2004)
  • Re: [enum-wg] WG: Telephone Number assined to IP telephony in Italy?, Francesco Bernabei (13 December 2004)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [enum-wg] WG: Telephone Number assined to IP telephony in Italy?, Stastny Richard (13 December 2004)
• AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Lothar Reith (13 December 2004)
  • Re: AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Andrzej Bartosiewicz (13 December 2004)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Stastny Richard (13 December 2004)
    • Re: AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Andrzej Bartosiewicz (13 December 2004)
      • Re: AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Otmar Lendl (13 December 2004)
      • Re: AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Andrzej Bartosiewicz (13 December 2004)
  • AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Stastny Richard (14 December 2004)
    • Re: AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Jim Reid (14 December 2004)
      • Re: AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP) (14 December 2004)
      • Re: AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Jim Reid (14 December 2004)
      • Re: AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Richard Shockey (14 December 2004)
      • Re: AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Jim Reid (14 December 2004)
      • Re: AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Richard Shockey (14 December 2004)
      • Re: AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP) (15 December 2004)
• [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Andrzej Bartosiewicz (10 December 2004)
  • Re: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Carsten Schiefner (10 December 2004)
    • Re: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Andrzej Bartosiewicz (11 December 2004)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Stastny Richard (11 December 2004)
    • Re: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Jim Reid (12 December 2004)
      • Re: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP) (12 December 2004)
      • Re: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Richard Shockey (12 December 2004)
      • Re: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Andrzej Bartosiewicz (13 December 2004)
      • Re: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Richard Shockey (13 December 2004)
      • Re: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Jim Reid (13 December 2004)
      • Re: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Andrzej Bartosiewicz (13 December 2004)
      • Re: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Richard Shockey (12 December 2004)
      • Re: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Marco bernardi (14 December 2004)
    • Re: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Andrzej Bartosiewicz (13 December 2004)
    • AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., John-Erik Horn (14 December 2004)
      • Re: AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Richard Shockey (14 December 2004)
      • Re: AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Jim Reid (14 December 2004)
      • Re: AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Richard Shockey (14 December 2004)
      • Re: AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., John C Klensin (14 December 2004)
      • Re: AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Richard Shockey (14 December 2004)
  • RE: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Stastny Richard (13 December 2004)
  • RE: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Lothar Reith (13 December 2004)
    • RE: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Andrzej Bartosiewicz (13 December 2004)
  • Re: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ..., Stastny Richard (13 December 2004)