RE: Interim Policy proposal for IPv6 Address Assignment Policy forInternet Exchange Points

All,

YES

 - and I am hoping that the WGs will reach consensus at the 
Prague meeting that the interim policy-based allocations will 
permit extension to a /48 allocation.


 Paul

 P. S. Mylotte
 IP Addressing & Naming 
 BTexact Technologies
 Adastral Park
 01473 606333 / + 44 1473 606333
 paul.mylotte@localhost

BTexact Technologies is a trademark of British Telecommunications plc
Registered office 81 Newgate Street London EC1A 7AJ
Registered in England no. 1800000

This electronic message contains information from British Telecommunications
plc which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to
be for the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not
the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution
or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have
received this electronic message in error, please notify us by telephone or
email (to the number or address above) immediately.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	David R Huberman [SMTP:huberman@localhost]
> Sent:	04 September 2001 17:57
> To:	lir-wg@localhost eix-wg@localhost ipv6-wg@localhost
> Subject:	Re: Interim Policy proposal for IPv6 Address Assignment
> Policy forInternet Exchange Points
> 
> > So I ask:
> > 
> > In lieu of any other policy changes, are you, as a RIPE member and
> > participant in the LIR, EIX, and IPv6 WGs, in favor of the interim
> policy
> > proposal for IPv6 address assignment policy for internet exchange
> points?
> 
> To answer my own question, I support the interim policy proposal and hope
> it is ratified by the WGs as soon as possible.
> 
> /david