About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: Interim Policy proposal for IPv6 Address Assignment Policy for Internet Exchange Points

  • To:
  • From: "Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" < >
  • Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 22:23:56 +0200

=>What I believe is needed is an allocation for IXP service networks as well
=>as for the IX mesh, which is globally routable. I'd like to propose this
=>alongside the existing proposal we have on the table.
=>
=>Comments?
=
=I agree with you Mike, I think this is the only way an IXP can show its
=independence from any one of its members (connected ISPs, carriers or
=whatever)
=
=  - Henk

  This "independence" argument is completly off-topic for this
  discussion.
  
  "Independence" can mean too many different things to too many different
  people. Usually you deal with that by making contingency plans or by
  building redundancy (or by defining procedures for the management
  plane ;-).
  
  Wilfried.





  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community