Re: Interim Policy proposal for IPv6 Address Assignment Policy for Internet Exchange Points

["Peter Galbavy" <]

> Please keep in mind that I for one don't want Joe Random's Own Little ISP,
> for example, get a sTLA.  The whole point of tightly aggregated DFZ is
> pointless if that would be the case.
>
> Getting IPv6 address space, subTLA-level address space, should be way more
> difficult than getting an IPv4 /29 delegation.
>
> Let's not lose the meaning of sTLA; it's not (in my book at least) meant
> for small ISP's.

While the technical discussion is very important, please also do not loose site
of the fact that it is not RIPEs role to act as a regulator. You cannot restrict
a companies (or individuals) ability to carry out normal business because you
think they are 'too small'. Be careful with what a policy says or a nice
committee from an EU competition commision will want to talk to you.

Peter