About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: Interim Policy proposal for IPv6 Address Assignment Policy for Internet Exchange Points

  • To: Henk Steenman < >
  • From: Randy Bush < >
  • Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 10:19:50 -0700
  • Cc: Mike Hughes < >

>> What I believe is needed is an allocation for IXP service networks as well
>> as for the IX mesh, which is globally routable. I'd like to propose this
>> alongside the existing proposal we have on the table.
> I agree with you Mike, I think this is the only way an IXP can show its
> independence from any one of its members (connected ISPs, carriers or
> whatever)

s/ixp/small isp/

i.e. the small isps want to appear independed from their upstream(s).
the discussion over this has been going on nigh a decade.  so what makes
an ixp's business so special they warrant special treatment?

randy




  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community