Fwd: Re: 90 IPv6 sub-TLA allocations made

[Fearghas McKay <]

This will also include a section for IXP IPv6 allocation.

This will hopefully be seperate from the main EIX-WG meeting as the 
schedule for it is fairly full currently.

If anyone want to present please contact David directly.

	f

--- begin forwarded text


Delivered-To: lists-lir-wg-out@localhost
X-mProtect:  Thu, 9 Aug 2001 06:06:48 -0700 Nokia Silicon Valley 
Messaging Protection
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 06:02:44 -0700
From: David Kessens david@localhost
To: Gert Doering gert@localhost
Cc: Stephen Burley stephenb@localhost, lir-wg@localhost, ipv6-wg@localhost
Subject: Re: 90 IPv6 sub-TLA allocations made
Sender: owner-lir-wg@localhost


On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 11:18:15AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
>  As far as I remember the IPv6 policy discussions on the last RIPE meetings,
>  one thing that was voiced repeatedly was
>
>    "if we have to hand out /48's to customers, a /35 for the LIR itself
>     is not enough"
For your information:

We are currently planning a joint session for ipv6 allocation policy
issues for the next RIPE meeting.

It would be really nice if we can get volunteers from the community
who can give a brief presentation on possible solutions. The problem
description is pretty clear by now, however, I have not seen any
(public) proposals yet on how to solve it. Obviously, there are
multiple ways to deal with the issue and it would be nice to discuss
advantages and disadvantages of different solutions.

David K.
---

--- end forwarded text