About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

RE: IPv6 for IXPs

  • To: "Michal Krsek" < >
  • From: Robert Kiessling < >
  • Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:22:19 +0200
  • Cc: "Mirjam Kuehne" < >
    < >

Michal Krsek writes:
 > Some IXPs are not only infrastructure for interconnection and they sometimes
 > offer some public services. I cannot determine all of them, but in example:
 > NTP, traffic statistics, root DNS servers and some other (hope people from
 > LINX or NETNOD should find some others).

I think this was addressed in the discussion, with the solution to get
normal IPv6 space from the usual sources for thoses services. For
example the K root nameserver does not sit on the LINX exchange
network itself, but in a very different netblock, and this model could
be applied to IPv6, too.

If an IXP insists on putting those services on the same net, they can
of course do so if they get routable IPv6 space for it, through
standard procedures. Use of those addresses for IXPs is in no way
forced.

 > > 3. definition of an IXP
 > > -----------------------

 > > Three or more ASes and thee or more separate entities attached to a
 > > LAN (a common layer 2 infrastructure) for the purpose of peering and
 > > more are welcome to join.
 > 
 > What is the goal of this definition? It is to restrict other subjects to use
 > these addresses?

I'd pragmatically say the need came up for addresses for this usage,
so it had to be defined somehow, in order not to create a source for
arbitrary non-routable globally-unique IPv6 addresses.

 > If yes, there are also some transit ISPs POPs which fit your definition. We
 > discussed definition of IXP on some forums, but we didn't get right
 > definition. Definition is different on basis of your goal :-)

Well, it can be discussed endlessly what the "right" definition is.  I
wouldn't mind if some "transit ISPs POPs" fit this definition if
people peer there (as opposed to just getting transit).

So they next question will be what "peering" is, but please, no ...

 > Hm ... So IXP have to establish it's own LIR or borrow this service from
 > it's members ? :-)

Yes, why not? It's not externally visible through which LIR the
request was made.

Robert





  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community