Re: Maintainer's responsibility (was Re: [dp-tf] Quadlogy of personproposals)

["Manfredo Miserocchi" <]

Janos, All,


> > there isn't necessarily a special contract between LIR and customer
> > that covers RIPE DB updates / maintainer issues. I don't see how the
> > maintainer's owner would be bound by RIPE-LIR contracts.
> 
> You are right. I was thinking here mainly of the future (i.e. not
> about the already existing objects).
> 
> A way to solve the problem of old objects is to keep track of
> maintainers
> we know are bound by a contract and those that are not.
> 
> Eventually, we may have to treat in some special way those personal
> objects that are not maintained by maintainers bound by a contract.
> For example we may have to hide them, delete them, etc. Probably
> hiding the data is better, as we can re-publish it if we can
> get the contract with the maintainer.

Absolutely agreed. We have to hide what we cannot manage.

Cheers
Manfredo


Si precisa che le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate e ad uso esclusivo del destinatario. Qualora il presente messaggio Le fosse pervenuto per errore, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo senza copiarlo ed a non inoltrarlo a terzi, dandocene gentilmente comunicazione. Grazie.

You are hereby informed that this message contains confidential informations intended for the addressee's use only. If yu're not the addressee and have received this message by mistake, please delete it and immediately notify us. You may not copy or disseminate this message to anyone. Thank you.